Inverse Finance seizes tokens, ships code: Launches stablecoin lending protocol

189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS

Related articles



Shortly after culling its neighborhood of inactive members, one in every of decentralized finance’s (DeFi) strangest experiments is launching a brand new stablecoin lending product.

On Wednesday Inverse Finance revealed the Anchor Protocol, a cash market constructed round DOLA, a protocol-native artificial stablecoin. Based mostly on “a modified fork of Compound,” in a blog put up Inverse Finance founder Nour Haridy compares Anchor to Synthetix, which points credit score within the type of artificial property again by overleveraged collateral, and Compound, which points credit score within the type of crypto asset loans additionally backed by overleveraged collateral.

Finally, Haridy sees these models as providing the same utility.

“Lending and artificial protocols each supply the identical service: credit score. Anchor brings the hole between them by combining them right into a unified borrowing protocol.”

Anchor goals to perform this with a singular structure that all the time treats the DOLA token as “$1 collateral that can be utilized to borrow different property no matter DOLA’s market situations or peg.” Customers deposit collateral, mint DOLA, after which can use DOLA to take out loans in different crypto property or just earn yield on DOLA. 

“For over-collateralized debtors and leveraged merchants, we provide them a one cease store the place they’ll share their collaterals throughout their artificial and token borrowing positions, permitting larger capital effectivity and better leverage,” says Haridy.

Haridy envisions Anchor will use DOLA for protocol-to-protocol lending just like Cream’s Iron Financial institution, for undercollateralized lending (long a prize in DeFi), and for the protocol to “lend itself” credit score to pursue yield farming alternatives.

No lifeless weight

Maybe extra attention-grabbing than Inverse’s growth on the protocol layer are the strikes they made earlier within the week on the governance layer. 

In what could also be a DeFi governance first, On Saturday Feb. 20, Inverse neighborhood members put forth two governance proposals to grab INV — Inverse’s at present non-transferrable governance token — from inactive neighborhood members. On Thursday Feb. 25, the proposals handed, and never everybody was proud of the outcome.

Haridy says that the timing was intentional — proper as Anchor, a protocol that may generate income for the DAO, prepares to launch, the neighborhood sheds freeloaders. 

“We wanted to weed out our lifeless weight to reclaim some tokens for re-distribution to new energetic members quickly. We additionally created an INV grants committee with the ability to reward contributors and add new members to the DAO. Moreover, when free riders are eliminated, energetic members develop into extra incentivized to contribute as a result of they get a bigger piece of the pie.”

Whereas the unprecedented transfer could seem harsh, it’s additionally merely making use of to governance the sort of aggressive style that put Inverse Finance on the map within the first place. By forcing token holders to take part underneath the specter of seized tokens, it’s helped with the event of Anchor as properly. 

“It is a collaborative effort amongst many DAO members ranging from ideation to growth to inside critiques and testing,” says Haridy.

The following step for Inverse can be getting Anchor off the bottom, and making ready for a world during which INV turns into tradable. Haridy says there’s a rising consensus in the neighborhood for tradability. This might imply that the DAO would hand over the ability to grab tokens, which might alter Inverse’s neighborhood panorama.

Haridy, nevertheless, appears unfazed by the looming shifts, already making ready the subsequent innovation.

“This may considerably change the present incentives and should cut back participation. Fortuitously, there’s some work on a brand new various governance mannequin that’s been occurring internally to handle this drawback.”